Twenty-two percent of global greenhouse gas emissions stem from Forestry, Land and Agricultural (FLAG) activities. It should come as no surprise that the apparel and textile industries play a big role in that figure as raw materials are frequently derived from natural, land-based sources.
FYI: Throughout this article, you’ll see us reference both the Greenhouse Gas Protocol (GHG Protocol) and the SBTi. These two bodies work closely together to ensure alignment in the accounting and target-setting for FLAG emissions. FLAG emissions, as defined by the SBTi, represent a subset of GHG Scope 3 emissions, focusing specifically on land-based emissions sources. For more on the GHG Protocol, read our Carbon Accounting for Fashion Guide.
FLAG emissions in a fashion and apparel company's Scope 3 category, specifically from Purchased Goods & Services, largely originate from the production of natural fibers like cotton, leather, and wool. In fact, for some apparel brands, wool alone can account for up to 50% of their total carbon emissions. That’s why accurately measuring and setting reduction targets from land-based CO2 emissions is essential for fashion brands to lower their climate impact.
The Science Based Targets initiative's (SBTi) FLAG guidance is a new framework that requires companies to measure and set precise reduction targets for their FLAG-related emissions in addition to their energy/industry SBT. For apparel and footwear brands, following this guidance can provide greater visibility into your emissions down to the farm level. In addition to reducing land-based emissions, following the SBTi FLAG guidance enables companies to identify opportunities to restore important carbon sinks such as forests, oceans, and peatlands.
The GHG Protocol provides the foundational guidelines and tools for companies to accurately measure and report their greenhouse gas emissions. In 2023, the organization released a draft Land Sector & Removals (LSR) guidance. SBTi has since mandated that companies use the GHG guidance to set targets.
Curious to deep-dive into the draft? Below is a recording of GHG Protocol Land Sector and Removals Draft Guidance Review Group launch webinar:
Source: https://ghgprotocol.org/land-sector-and-removals-guidance
The two issues blocking the completion of the GHG Protocol Land Sector and Removals Standard and Guidance about which the different commitees yet not agreed are:
However, GHG Protocol Land Sector and Removals Standard Guidance will be published in Q4 2025.
SBTi is a corporate climate action organization that helps companies set emissions-reduction targets grounded in climate science, driving climate action towards the goals of the Paris Agreement. The organization has developed a series of standards, tools, and guidance mechanisms, but until recently, their work only covered energy and industry-related GHG emissions. Enter FLAG, expanding the scope from energy-and-industry only.
There are five key requirements of the SBTi FLAG Guidance:
The new FLAG guidance enlarges the scope of their work, enabling fashion and textile brands to include FLAG emissions. As you’ll soon see it’s extremely comprehensive, and at times complex. It demands a lot of data — especially from suppliers — but we’ll take it piece by piece and delve into how your brand can utilize this guidance.
There are three critical emissions-related categories covered under the FLAG guidance that will define how data is collected and later reported upon.
These include:
This category highlights the environmental impact of transforming natural ecosystems — whether that’s deforestation, forest degradation, or wetland conversion — into agricultural land. The amount of time that has passed since the land was transformed for agricultural purposes will impact the emissions count, which will be discounted linearly over 20 years.
Tip: fossil-based emissions from machinery (e.g., tractors) and energy emissions embedded in fertilizer are not technically "land-based emissions." However, you can choose to include them in your FLAG emissions accounting. Alternatively, they may be included in an energy/industry target, but pay attention not to double-count them across FLAG and energy/industry targets.
SBTi reporting is not currently mandatory from a regulatory standpoint. However, it does serve as a strong framework for reducing carbon emissions in line with reporting requirements such as the CSRD. Companies submitting new SBTi targets or doing their rebaselining must already submit FLAG SBTs today, using the GHG Protocol FLAG draft guidelines.
If your business has already set SBTs, then you will be required to set a FLAG SBT if 20% or more of your Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions are derived from FLAG sources. In other words, a large percentage of apparel and footwear brands.
The SBTi recommends that companies with FLAG-related emissions that fall below the 20% threshold nonetheless set a FLAG target. If a company chooses not to set a FLAG target, FLAG-related emissions still must be included in the overall energy/industry (non-FLAG) target boundary.
Small and medium enterprises (SMEs) are exempt if they meet two or more of the following criteria:
Many apparel and footwear brands will find that 20% of their emissions are derived from land-based uses. If you use naturally sourced materials such as wool, viscose, rayon, cotton, or leather, there’s a good chance your company falls in this category.
Below are some anonymous examples from our customers using wool:
In order to assess your own percentage, you’ll first need detailed insights into your value chain. If you’re already measuring your environmental impact for legislation such as the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive, you will already be collecting much of this data. If not, utilizing a sustainability platform to measure product emissions – such as Carbonfact – will provide deep insights into your textile supply chain.
Without the use of Carbonfact, your approach would likely be:
The timeline for implementation is in flux, depending on when the final FLAG Guidance by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol is released (you can access the draft here). For now, companies should expect the following:
Example of a FLAG target:
For fashion brands setting FLAG targets, it’s important to adhere to the data-quality guidelines from the GHG Protocol's Land Sector and Removals Guidance.
To calculate land use change (LUC) emissions, textile companies should use the most accurate and representative data available – whether from their own operations, suppliers or established emission factors. For FLAG scope 3 emissions, companies should collect high-quality data from suppliers and value chain partners. If emission factors are used, they should be representative of the commodity and region, and any uncertainty associated with default data should be disclosed.
Companies should use granular, representative data for FLAG-related emissions, disaggregating emissions by commodity and region, and separating land use change emissions from land management emissions. CO2 and non-CO2 emissions from land management should also be reported separately.
Land removals should rely on primary data to be included in a FLAG target.
The GHG Protocol is still determining how to account for CO₂ emissions and removals from forest land and has yet to resolve agricultural leakage quantification. Since FLAG is built on the GHG Protocol, companies must continue using interim guidance until the GHG Land Sector and Removals Standard and Guidance is published in Q4 2025.
Preparing early minimizes compliance risks and last-minute challenges:
Investing in FLAG compliance now ensures smooth reporting when the requirements take effect.
Carbonfact is built to collect and make sense of large datasets and to give your company practical, auditable climate reporting tools. FLAG guidance is data-intensive — and meeting it requires deep supplier data, careful LCA work, and robust reporting. Here’s how Carbonfact helps brands implement FLAG-aligned measurement and reporting.
1. Source & consolidate the right data
Calculating a FLAG inventory starts with granular inputs. For example, when assessing deforestation we look at project location, duration, vegetation type, and the final land use after conversion — all of which feed into a land-use change CO₂ metric. Carbonfact helps you consolidate purchase-order and supplier data and fill missing values so you can produce representative FLAG estimates.
2. Extract FLAG-relevant LCA emissions
FLAG calculations rely heavily on product-level LCA. For a wool sweater, for instance, you must extract agricultural emissions (fertiliser use, manure) and related upstream inputs (fertiliser production). Carbonfact links product bill-of-materials with emission factors and LCA outputs so the FLAG portion can be isolated at the product level.
Watch this short demo by our Head of Science:
3. FLAG reporting aligned with GHG Protocol
You can report FLAG emissions separately according to the GHG Protocol guidance referenced by SBTi. Carbonfact’s output is structured to support FLAG-specific disclosures and SBTi submissions, ensuring your reporting aligns with current guidance.
4. Track FLAG emissions over time
Carbonfact’s Trends view includes FLAG emissions tracking, letting you monitor whether FLAG emissions are increasing or decreasing and assess progress against reduction targets and no-deforestation commitments.
Recently, we hosted a webinar with Dr. Laurent Vandepaer, PhD, Carbonfact's Head of Science. You can find the on-demand recording of the webinar above. Below is a sneak peek of the Q&A session from the discussion:
There is no official list with companies that have set FLAG targets. However, if you search “FLAG” in SBT Dashboard, you will find quite a few cases.
- SBTi FLAG Guidance https://sciencebasedtargets.org/resources/files/SBTiFLAGGuidance.pdf
- GHG Protocol FLAG guidance draft https://ghgprotocol.org/land-sector-and-removals-guidance