Carbon Footprint of a Tank Top

Gain insights into the carbon footprint of tank tops across their lifecycle. Explore key emission hotspots, process contributions, and opportunities for sustainable improvements backed by analytical data.

6.91 kg CO2e The Carbon Footprint of a Tank Top Tank Top Carbon Footprint
What's the Carbon Footprint of A Tank Top?

What's the Carbon Footprint of A Tank Top?

The average carbon footprint of a tank top is 8.43 kg CO₂e. This value is based on a product count of 3,779 tank tops with an average mass of 171.08 g. The emissions range from 3.52 kg CO₂e to 19.35 kg CO₂e, indicating variation across different production methods and materials.
  • Minimum footprint: 3.52 kg CO2e
  • Median footprint: 6.91 kg CO2e
  • Maximum footprint: 19.35 kg CO2e

Carbon Emissions by Process Step in Tank Top Production

Each Tank Top's footprint includes emissions from multiple manufacturing stages. The following process steps were identified as carbon hotspots for Tank Top:
  • Coloration 0.45 kg CO₂e
  • Finishing 0.59 kg CO₂e
  • Yarn Formation 0.44 kg CO₂e
Carbon Emissions by Process Step in Tank Top Production

Key Insights from the Environmental Data on Tank Top

Emissions Variation Range

The tank top emissions range from 3.52 kg CO₂e to 19.35 kg CO₂e, indicating a significant variation of 15.83 kg CO₂e between the minimum and maximum values. This wide range suggests that production methods and material choices can greatly impact the environmental footprint.

Coloration and Finishing Hotspots

The coloration (0.45 kg CO₂e) and finishing (0.59 kg CO₂e) steps emerge as the most carbon-intensive processes in tank top manufacturing. Focusing on improving efficiencies and exploring sustainable alternatives in these areas could yield substantial emissions reductions.

Yarn Formation Emissions

Yarn formation contributes 0.44 kg CO₂e per tank top, highlighting the importance of sustainable fiber sourcing and energy-efficient yarn production methods to minimize the product's environmental impact.

Product Mass Relationship

With an average mass of 171.08 g, the tank top's emissions exhibit a potential relationship with product weight. Lighter-weight designs or material substitutions could present opportunities for reducing the overall carbon footprint.

time-best-invention Time’s Best Invention 2024

Environmental Data Platform for Fashion

Product LCA | Carbon Accounting | Reporting | Eco-Design

Get in touch
Watch a demo
Environmental Data Platform for Fashion

CHOSEN by Hundreds of BRANDS AND SUPPLIERS

"Shoes can consist of up to 1500 components. Before Carbonfact, we asked our developers to weigh every single piece but such a manual approach is not scalable. Carbonfact helped us  in deriving rules to overcome data gaps by creating accurate assumptions."

Philipp Engels
Product Sustainability Lead at On
Philipp Engels

"With Carbonfact we can do full product LCAs on all of our products. Thanks to measuring things early on, we can simulate how a new product is going to have a different impact compared to the current version. For example, one of our new products is expected to decrease its footprint by a fourth just by designing it differently."

Jessica Genta
Strategy & Sustainability at La Sportiva
Jessica Genta-1

"We needed a solution that could handle the complexities of the apparel supply chain, provide year-to-date insights, and support with detailed scenario analyses for our supply chain. For us Carbonfact is not just a Carbon Management Software, but an extension of our sustainability team."

Florence Degoy Vacher
Secrétaire Générale at A.P.C.
FlorenceDegoyVacher

"What's really special about Carbonfact is the way that it can work alongside the VF brands to help identify where there are gaps in our product impact data. But also helping us bridge towards improving that data. So it's much more of a partner to solve the challenges we have."

Julian Lings
Senior Sustainability Manager, The Northface
Julian Lings

"The Explorer is, for sure, my favorite feature. I love the ability to look at the breakdown of the carbon footprint per product line, for processes or on a material basis. That's so dynamic that we're able to leverage it in different ways depending on the projects that we're working on or the teams that we're engaging with."

Emily Foster
Director of Planet & People Impact at Burton
Emily Foster

"Carbonfact's offerings, particularly its product-level focus for footwear and apparel, ensures we can both measure our carbon footprint and actively find ways to reduce it. Carbonfact has been instrumental in helping us model different scenarios and make informed decisions that align with our sustainability goals."

Aileen Lerch
Sustainability at Allbirds
Aileen Lerch-1

"We have moved from spend-based carbon accounting into Carbonfact to prioritize primary data and get more accurate calculations. The main reason for us to choose Carbonfact is that we now not only get our company's total carbon footprint but also break it down for each of our products."

Malin Bosaeus
Global Sustainability Manager at Happy Socks
Malin Bosaeus

References

Data sourced from Carbonfact’s proprietary database, powered by over 50 million LCAs run on textile, fashion, and footwear products. The methodology is aligned with the EU Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) and adapted for product category specificity.

Find more information about our LCA methodology here.
Group 41859

If you click on “Accept all” you agree to the use of these cookies. To find out more about the cookies we use, see our Privacy & Cookie Policy. Or, you can continue without agreeing .