If you want to learn about the PEFCR for Apparel and Footwear methodology, please read our easy-to-understand deep dive for textile brands here.
What's New in the Final Version of PEFCR for Apparel & Footwear
With the final version now complete and awaiting a final vote forand formal approval from the EU Commission, several significant changes have been introduced. These updates aim to clarify the methodology, improve data consistency, and ensure alignment with the latest scientific developments.
Once adopted, the framework is expected to play a central role in upcoming EU legislation — meaning brands will need to use it to assess and communicate the environmental footprint of their products.
Specifically, under the Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR), it will be used to assess key product criteria like durability, repairability, and recyclability, and will feed into Digital Product Passports (DPPs) required for all textile products sold in the EU. In parallel, the Green Claims Directive will likely mandate the use of PEF to substantiate any environmental marketing claims, ensuring that labels such as “eco” or “climate neutral” are backed by harmonized, science-based data. Together, these regulations aim to standardize sustainability communication and product transparency across the industry.
You can find the latest version (3.0) of the full PEFCR guideline here.
The new PEFCR makes measuring the environmental impact of fashion products clearer. They now take into account how long a product lasts, how easily it can be repaired, and even how it’s washed, packaged, and shipped. Brands will need to use more accurate data and follow stricter rules if they want to make environmental claims or comply with upcoming EU regulations.
Durability and Repairability Now Count Toward Your Score
PEFCR now rewards products that last longer and can be repaired. If you prove your product is durable or repairable, your environmental score improves. If you don’t provide evidence, a default penalty applies (your product will be scored with a shortened lifetime).
What’s new:
- Environmental score per use depends on how long the product lasts.
- Separate scoring for durability (Intrinsic Durability Multiplier - IDM) and repairability (Repairability Multiplier - RM).
- Includes lab testing protocols for each product category (e.g. t-shirts, ski jackets, shoes).
- Small series, fur, leather, and menstrual underwear are exempt.
Where to find it: Pages 50–67, Annex V and VI
Circular Footprint Formula (CFF) Has Been Updated
End-of-life impacts and recycled content are now calculated more consistently.
What’s new:
- New layout for the calculation formulas.
- New emphasis on material quality indicators (Qp, Qsin, Qsout).
- The “B” factor (for energy recovery at end-of-life) is always set to zero – this simplifies comparisons and reduces inconsistencies.
- New lists of recyclability disruptors that affect your end-of-life score.
Where to find it: Pages 124–139
Fibrer Fragment Impact Module Introduced
PEFCR now includes the impact of fibrer fragments (e.g. microplastics) released during care (washing, drying).
What’s new:
- Calculates how much fibrer is released and its effect on marine ecosystems.
- Includes example calculations.
- Still evolving as scientific knowledge improves.
Where to find it: Pages 73–77
Use- Phase Modelling Is Now More Realistic
PEFCR v3.0 has more accurate assumptions about how people care for different garments.
What’s new:
- Care habits (washing, drying, ironing, repairs) are tailored to each product type.
- Example: tights and underwear are washed more frequently than jackets or boots.
- Energy, water, and detergent use varies per item.
Product Lifetime (Duration of Service) Is Refined
Product lifetime now depends more on product type, material, and performance.
What’s new:
- New default lifespans per product subcategory (e.g. 45 uses for t-shirts, 100 for coats).
- Durability and repairability scores can increase or reduce the calculated lifetime.
- Special rules added for leather, fur, and reused items.
Where to find it: Pages 47–49
Packaging Modelling Has Been Improved
Packaging-related emissions are now more accurately reflected.
What’s new:
- Different default packaging footprints for e-commerce, F2C (factory to consumer), and retail.
- Better assumptions on packaging weights, materials, and recycling rates.
Where to find it: Pages 149–154
New Distribution Scenarios
Your actual logistics model now matters.
What’s new:
- You can choose between three default logistics models:
- Factory-to-consumer (F2C)
- Classic e-commerce
- Retail
- Each has predefined transport legs, emission factors, and distances.
- You can also use your own transport data if available.
Where to find it: Pages 164–183, Annex VII
Stricter Data Requirements
You now need more primary (company-specific) data for your products.
What’s new:
- You must provide primary data covering at least 95% of your Bill of Materials (by weight).
- You must report the percentage of unsold products and the share of air freight in your distribution.
- If you don’t have access to everything, guidance is provided on how to choose appropriate proxies.
Where to find it: Pages 96–106, 111
New Guidance on Using Proxies and Secondary Data
To help brands who don’t control every part of their supply chain, PEF v3.0 introduces clearer rules on what to do when you’re missing data.
What’s new:
- A new “Data Needs Matrix” helps you decide when and how to use secondary data.
- Includes 3 supply chain scenarios: full access, partial access, and no access.
- Examples and decision trees are included.
Where to find it: Pages 109–115, Annex VIII (page 246)
New Rules for Tool Verification and Software Use
If you use a software tool to calculate PEF scores, it now has to follow stricter rules.
What’s new:
- All tools must go through a one-time pre-verification process.
- If your tool is used in over 100 PEF studies per year, it must be reviewed annually.
- 10 random PEF studies must be verified each year.
- If the software changes in a way that affects results, it must be re-verified.
Where to find it: Pages 220–221, Annex XI (page 267)
Limits on Product Comparisons
Certain products can’t be compared with others due to current data limitations.
You cannot compare:
- Leather or fur products with textile products.
- Menstrual underwear with other underwear.
- Small series products (unless durability-tested).
Where to find it: Page 82, Annex V and VI
Future Developments (Flagged in the Document)
PEFCR 3.0 also outlines ideas for future versions.
What’s being explored:
- A separate indicator for biodiversity.
- Deeper fibrer fragment modelling.
- Research into the real-world impact of repairability vs. durability.
- Better communication materials to explain environmental scores to consumers.
Where to find it: Annex X (page 264)
Source:https://drive.google.com/file/d/1dONIPjfpRESLxR2bujF7RHpJswkvRaRx/view
How Can Carbonfact Help?
Carbonfact is an environmental data platform purpose-built for apparel and footwear. As EU regulations like the PEFCR raise expectations for data accuracy, transparency, and reporting, manual LCA processes are no longer scalable.
Our platform integrates directly with your core systems (ERP, PLM, etc.), cleans and analyzes product data, and automatically fills in missing information using the EF 3.1-compliant dataset. Instead of drastically increasing headcount to perform LCAs across the entire product catalogue, Carbonfact enables brands to automatically generate product-level footprint calculations aligned with the final PEFCR.
With Carbonfact, sustainability and product teams can instantly view PEF scores across their catalog, pinpoint high-impact stages, model reduction strategies, and generate audit-ready reports – all in one place.
See how it works in the demo video: